1.
Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 self-amplifying RNA vaccine expressing an anchored RBD: A randomized, observer-blind phase 1 study.
Akahata, W, Sekida, T, Nogimori, T, Ode, H, Tamura, T, Kono, K, Kazami, Y, Washizaki, A, Masuta, Y, Suzuki, R, et al
Cell reports. Medicine. 2023;(8):101134
Abstract
VLPCOV-01 is a lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccine that expresses a membrane-anchored receptor-binding domain (RBD) derived from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein. A phase 1 study of VLPCOV-01 is conducted (jRCT2051210164). Participants who completed two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine previously are randomized to receive one intramuscular vaccination of 0.3, 1.0, or 3.0 μg VLPCOV-01, 30 μg BNT162b2, or placebo. No serious adverse events have been reported. VLPCOV-01 induces robust immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers against the RBD protein that are maintained up to 26 weeks in non-elderly participants, with geometric means ranging from 5,037 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1,272-19,940) at 0.3 μg to 12,873 (95% CI 937-17,686) at 3 μg compared with 3,166 (95% CI 1,619-6,191) with 30 μg BNT162b2. Neutralizing antibody titers against all variants of SARS-CoV-2 tested are induced. VLPCOV-01 is immunogenic following low-dose administration. These findings support the potential for saRNA as a vaccine platform.
2.
Efficacy of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose Compared to Sodium Hyaluronate as Submucosal Injectant for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Nakamura, J, Hikichi, T, Watanabe, K, Hashimoto, M, Kato, T, Takagi, T, Suzuki, R, Sugimoto, M, Takasumi, M, Sato, Y, et al
Digestion. 2021;(5):753-759
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sodium hyaluronate (SH) is a useful submucosal injectant for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). On the other hand, sodium carboxymethylcellulose (SCMC), which has high viscosity, has also been applied clinically. We evaluated the efficacy of SCMC compared to that of SH in gastric ESD. METHODS A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of 1.0% SCMC as the injectant (SCMC group) compared to 0.4% SH (SH group) for ESD of gastric neoplasms. The primary end point was the procedure time of ESD. Secondary end points were treatment outcomes such as en bloc and R0 resection rates, number of hemostases, amount of injectant, ease of treatment (visual analog scale, 1-10 points), adverse events, and rate of ulcer healing 8 weeks after ESD. RESULTS A total of 60 patients were enrolled between October 2014 and October 2018, and 30 patients were allocated in each group. The procedure time (mean ± SD, minutes) was not significantly different between the SCMC (74.7 ± 54.5) and SH groups (67.1 ± 41.4) (p = 0.547). Furthermore, there were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of en bloc and R0 resection rates, number of hemostases, amount of injectant, ease of treatment, and rate of ulcer healing. No serious adverse events were observed in either group. CONCLUSION SCMC was comparable to SH in terms of procedure time, treatment outcome, and ease and safety of treatment in gastric ESD. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the differences between the 2 injectants.
3.
Tamibarotene maintenance improved relapse-free survival of acute promyelocytic leukemia: a final result of prospective, randomized, JALSG-APL204 study.
Takeshita, A, Asou, N, Atsuta, Y, Sakura, T, Ueda, Y, Sawa, M, Dobashi, N, Taniguchi, Y, Suzuki, R, Nakagawa, M, et al
Leukemia. 2019;(2):358-370
Abstract
Between April 2004 and December 2010, we conducted a prospective randomized controlled study comparing tamibarotene with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in the maintenance therapy of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), and here report the final results of this study with a median follow-up of 7.3 years. Of 344 eligible patients who had received ATRA and chemotherapy, 319 (93%) achieved complete remission (CR). After completion of three courses of consolidation chemotherapy, 269 patients in molecular remission underwent maintenance randomization, 135 to ATRA (45 mg/m2 daily), and 134 to tamibarotene (6 mg/m2 daily) for 14 days every 3 months for 2 years. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). The 7-year RFS was 84% in the ATRA arm and 93% in the tamibarotene arm (p = 0.027, HR = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.93). The difference was prominent in high-risk patients with initial leukocytes ≥ 10.0 × 109/L (62% vs. 89%; p = 0.034). Tamibarotene was significantly superior to ATRA by decreasing relapse in high-risk patients. Overall survival after randomization did not differ (96% vs. 97%; p = 0.520). Secondary hematopoietic disorders developed in nine patients, secondary malignancies in 11, and grade 3 or more late cardiac comorbidities in three. These late complications did not differ between the two arms.